2019 California Law Requires Repeat DUI Offenders to Install Breathalyzers (Ignition Interlock Devices) in Cars
Under a California law that took effect on January 1, 2019, ignition interlock devices (IID) must be installed in the vehicles of those who have been convicted of driving under the influence (DUI) multiple times or just once if injury was involved. The interlock device must remain in the vehicle for a period of 12-48 months.
Commonly known as breathalyzers, IIDs are connected to a vehicle’s engine and detect alcohol on the breath of a driver. If alcohol is detected, the IID prevents the vehicle from starting. The IID also requires “rolling” samples during vehicle operation. If a breath sample fails during operation, it will record the failed test on the device.
New Laws Under SB 1046
While the new requirements took effect at the beginning of this year, the original ignition interlock device (IID) law was actually approved in 2016 (California Senate Bill 1046).
The legislation was introduced as a pilot program in February 2016 and only applied to four counties: Alameda, Los Angeles, Sacramento, and Tulare. The program was extended until July 2018. During the pilot program, DUI offenders in these counties were subject to the conditions that now apply to every driver in the state.
The law says IIDs are required in the following situations:
- The first time a driver is convicted of DUI that results in an injury, he or she must have an IID in his or her vehicle for six months
- The first time a driver is convicted of DUI and it does not result in injury, he or she can choose to drive for six months with an IID or for one year with a restricted license
- For a second DUI, an IID is required for a one-year period
- For a third DUI, an IID is required for a two-year period
- For a fourth DUI as well as subsequent DUIs, an IID is required for a three-year period
These changes expire in 2026 unless there are more revisions to the law.
Benefits of Ignition Interlock Devices
As of July 2018, 32 states and the District of Columbia required the installation of IIDs for all convicted drunk drivers. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states that requiring or incentivizing the use of IIDs reduces repeat DUI offenses by about 70 percent.
According to Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), California IIDs have prevented more than one million drinking and driving events since 2010. A report from the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) states that IIDs are 74 percent more effective in preventing repeat DUIs compared to suspending the driver’s licenses of first time DUI offenders. Among second time DUI offenders, IIDs are 70 percent more effective.
Approximately 50 to 75 percent of DUI offenders in California continue to drive illegally after an arrest, and do not join IID or treatment programs. The new IID law aims to incentivize IID use by allowing offenders to gain driving privileges soon after arrest if they comply with restrictions.
Arguments Against the New Law
There are some who oppose the new law requiring IID installation for DUI offenders. Some say the requirement is too harsh for first-time DUI offenders. Others point out that repeat offenses typically occur more than six months after the first. With IIDs only required for six months following a first offense, opponents argue the devices would not be helpful in deterring repeat DUIs.
Others cite the cost of installation and maintenance and say this creates a financial burden for offenders. IIDs have an estimated monthly cost between $60 and $80 for maintenance.
Contact Our Attorneys After a Collision
If you were injured in a car accident caused by a drunk driver, you may be entitled to compensation for your medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Our Sacramento car accident attorneys can review your claim and inform you of the legal options available to obtain the compensation you deserve.
Request a free, no obligation consultation today. There are no upfront fees. You only pay us if we recover compensation on your behalf.
Call (916) 777-7777 today.
Free Case Evaluation
Client Reviews
Mahul did a really good job. His been very helpful and was able to meet the client's need. His turn time was quick and very reliable. I am happy with the outcome. :)Happy client. I recommend Mahul and the team for the job well done.
I spoke to Stephanie regarding a possible case. It wasn't something they could take but she was very knowledgeable and helped send me in the right direction.
Truly great people. A great team and amazing effort. They moved very fast with my case and made sure I was alert every step of the way. They are also very welcoming and very comforting in hard times. I would strongly recommend this firm.
I want to sing praise for Mrs Frances Siria @ Arnold Law Firm. She is an amazing asset to your company, very professional and such a pleasure to have worked with….. I can’t say enough about Mrs. Siria 😃 If I could give 6 ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ I would!
I love my Team Tony! Joy and Larisa are the absolute best! They've helped me emotionally and physically, and they were always there for me when I needed someone to talk to. They definitely walked me through my problems and helped me understand everything every step of the way. I would 100% recommend them!!! Tony has the best support that I could have ever asked for. They are kind, extremely knowledgeable, and approachable. I could not thank them enough! Please give them a try.